The Endoscopic Lateral Transorbital Approach for the Removal of Select Sphenoid Wing and Middle Fossa Meningiomas. Surgical Technique and Short-Term Outcomes

Article Link

Abstract

Background and objective: The endoscopic lateral transorbital approach (eLTOA) is a relatively new approach to the skull base that has only recently been applied in vivo in the management of complex skull base pathology. Most meningiomas removed with this approach have been in the spheno-orbital location. We present a series of select purely sphenoid wing and middle fossa meningiomas removed through eLTOA. The objective here was to describe the selection criteria and results of eLTOA for a subset of sphenoid wing and middle fossa meningiomas.

Methods: This is a retrospective study based on a prospectively maintained database of consecutive cases of eLTOA operated on at our institution by the lead author. The cohort's clinical and radiographic characteristics and outcome are presented.

Results: Five patients underwent eLTOA to remove 3 sphenoid wing and 2 middle fossa meningiomas. The mean tumor volume was 11.9 cm 3 . Gross total resection was achieved in all cases. There were no intraoperative complications. Postoperatively, there was one case of subretinal hemorrhage, which was corrected by open vitrectomy repair, and one case of cerebrospinal fluid leak, which resolved with lumbar drainage. Three patients presented with visual impairment, 1 improved, 1 remained stable, and 1 worsened, but returned to stable after vitrectomy repair. All patients have been free of disease at a median follow-up of 8.9 months.

Conclusion: eLTOA provides a direct minimal access corridor to certain well-selected sphenoid wing and middle fossa meningiomas. eLTOA minimizes brain retraction and provides a high rate of gross total resection. Meningiomas appropriately selected based on size, type, and location of dural attachment, and the eLTOA is a safe, rapid, and highly effective procedure with acceptable morbidity.

Endoscopic Transorbital Surgery: Another Leap of Faith?

Article Link

Abstract

Twenty years ago, if you had told the neurosurgery community that in a mere 2 decades, skull base surgeons would be working through the nostrils using endoscopes to remove not only the majority of pituitary tumors but also craniopharyngiomas, chordomas, chondrosarcomas, and tuberculum sella meningiomas, your remarks would have been met with raised eyebrows and a few polite chuckles of disbelief. From our current perspective, it is now difficult to imagine not removing these tumors using an extended endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). The EEA provides a unique perspective to an area of the brain that is difficult to expose without manipulating, and possibly damaging, the very anatomy we are trying so desperately to preserve. Whether outcomes have improved compared with more traditional transcranial approaches is still a matter of debate, but one would certainly not be faulted for choosing an EEA, which has now become a widely accepted neurosurgical technique.


To some of us in the skull base community, it has become more and more apparent that transorbital approaches are poised to explode into our collective neurosurgical consciousness as a similarly powerful minimal access approach that can expose specific areas of the skull base that have vexed neurosurgeons for decades.The idea of using the orbit, already crowded with our most precious sensory organ, as a route for surgery, seems counterintuitive and even in direct conflict to our primary maxim, “primum non nocere.” The purpose of this article is to compare and contrast the 2 approaches, review the similarities and differences, and help provide a greater understanding of how the transorbital approach may soon transform our neurosurgical perspective.

Transorbital Endoscopic Eyelid Approach for Resection of Spheno-Orbital Meningioma: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

Article Link

Abstract

The transorbital endoscopic approach through a minimally invasive eyelid incision provides a coplanar avenue to the anterior middle fossa while obviating some drawbacks of a temporal craniotomy. A 60-year-old right-handed woman presented with headaches and temporal lobe dysfunction. Imaging revealed a 1.6-cm dural-based enhancing tumor of the medial greater sphenoid wing with associated hyperostosis and T2 flair signal change in the adjacent left temporal lobe. The patient consented to a transorbital approach to obtain long-term tumor control and to facilitate histopathological diagnosis while obviating the risks of temporal craniotomy. Under general anesthesia, an upper eyelid crease incision was made by an oculoplastics specialist, orbicularis was divided, and blunt dissection was carried down to the orbital rim. The periosteum was incised with monopolar cautery, and a periosteal elevator was used to reflect the periorbita off the lateral orbital wall. A silastic sheet protected the orbital contents beneath a malleable retractor. A 4-mm 30-cm 0° endoscope was held by an assistant, and the lateral orbital wall was drilled exposing the temporalis. The hyperostotic sphenoid bone between the superior and inferior orbital fissures was completely removed. The meningo-orbital band was divided to release the orbit from the medial middle fossa dura. The tumor was removed en bloc, and a multilayer dural closure was performed using the “button” technique. Postoperative MRI confirmed complete removal of the tumor and hyperostotic bone. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 2 with diagnosis of grade I meningioma. 

Endoscopic Transorbital Avenue to the Skull Base: Four-Step Conceptual Analysis of the Anatomic Journey.

Article Link

Abstract

Background: In the last decades, skull base surgery had passed through an impressive evolution. The role of neuroanatomic research has been uppermost, and it has played a central role in the development of novel techniques directed to the skull base. Indeed, the deep and comprehensive study of skull base anatomy has been one of the keys of success of the endoscopic endonasal approach to the skull base. In the same way, dedicated efforts expended in the anatomic lab has been a powerful force for the growth of the endoscopic transorbital approach to the lateral skull base.Therefore, in this conceptual paper, the main steps for the anatomic description of the endoscopic transorbital approach to the skull base have been detailed.

Methods: The anatomic journey for the development of the endoscopic transorbital approach to the skull base has been analyzed, and four "conceptual" steps have been highlighted.

Results: As neurosurgeons, the eyeball has always represented a respectful area: to become familiar with this complex and delicate anatomy, we started by examining the orbital anatomy on a dry skull (step 1). Hence, step 1 is represented by a detailed bone study; step 2 is centered on cadaveric dissection; step 3 consists in 3D quantitative assessment of the novel endoscopic transorbital corridor; and finally, step 4 is the translation of the preclinical data in the real surgical scenario by means of dedicated surgical planning.

Conclusions: The conceptual analysis of the anatomic journey for the description of the endoscopic transorbital approach to the skull base resulted in four main methodological steps that should not be thought strictly consequential but rather interconnected. Indeed, such steps should evolve following the drives that can arise in each specific situation. In conclusion, the four-step anatomic rehearsal can be relevant for the description, diffusion, and development of a novel technique in order to facilitate the application of the endoscopic transorbital approach to the skull base in a real surgical scenario.

Endoscopic Superior Eyelid Transorbital Approach: How I Do It.

Article Link

Abstract

Background: The endoscopic transorbital approach to the skull base is currently growing in popularity, and it is nowadays progressively used as a skull base approach. Clinical experience, along with detailed anatomical knowledge, makes this technique safe and effective.

Method: We present a step by step description of our technique based on the most recent anatomic references, and clinical experience. In order to better understand every phase of the procedure, we propose to keep on the following scheme, that is (1) skin phase; (2) working space; (3) lesion removal; (4) reconstruction. Hence, alone or in combination with the well-known endonasal pathway, the transorbital avenue seems to be a useful approach for selected skull base lesions. We present our technique, along with an anatomic analysis on cadaveric specimens.

Conclusions: Detailed knowledge of surgical anatomy, and a specific stepwise analysis of each part of the surgical procedure, is notably useful in order to safely and effectively perform a superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital surgery to the skull base.

Superior Eyelid Endoscopic Transorbital Approach to the Tentorial Area: A Qualitative and Quantitative Anatomic Study.

Article Link
Abstract

Objective: Superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach (SETOA) is nowadays gaining progressive application in neurosurgical scenarios. Both anatomic and clinical reports have demonstrated the possibility of taking advantage of the orbital corridor as a minimally invasive route to reach anterior and middle cranial fossae and manage selected surgical lesions developing in these areas. The aim of this paper is to further shed light on other anatomic regions of the skull base as seen from a transorbital perspective, namely, the posterior cranial fossa and tentorial area, describing technical feasibility and steps in reaching this area through an extradural-transtentorial approach and providing quantitative evaluations of the "working area" obtained through this route.

Material and methods: Four cadaveric heads (eight sides) were dissected at the Laboratory of Surgical Neuroanatomy (LSNA) of the University of Barcelona, Spain. A stepwise dissection of the transorbital approach to the tentorial area was described. Qualitative anatomical descriptions and quantitative analyses of working were evaluated by using pre- and postdissections CT and MRI scans, and three-dimensional reconstructions were made using Amira software.

Results: With the endoscopic transorbital approach, posterior cranial fossa dura was reached by an extradural middle cranial fossa approach and drilling of the petrous apex. After clipping the superior petrosal sinus, the tentorium was divided and cut. An endoscope was then introduced in the posterior cranial fossa at the level of the tentorial incisura. Qualitative analysis provided a description of the tentorial and petrosal surfaces of the cerebellum, middle tentorial incisura, cerebellopontine fissures, and, after arachnoid dissection, by a 30° endoscopic visualization, the posterior aspect of the cerebellomesencephalic fissure. Quantitative analysis of the "working area" obtained after bone removal was also provided.

Conclusions: This anatomic qualitative and quantitative study sheds light on the anatomy of the posterior cranial fossa contents, such as the tentorial area and incisura, as seen through a transorbital perspective. The first aim of the article is to enrich the anatomical knowledge as seen through this relatively new corridor and to provide quantitative details and insights into the technical feasibility of reaching these regions in a surgical scenario.

A way to improve skull base surgery through the advanced application of endoscopic techniques.

Pages

Members area